Legal Opinion

McLemore v. Hawkins

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1872PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to the circuit court of Carroll county, Niles, J. [Counsel on both sides filed elaborate written arguments which are too lengthy for insertion here, and too full and compact to justify any abridgment by the reporter.]

1Opinion of the Court

Simrall, J. :

McLemore, Rayburn & Co., being indebted to the Louisiana State Bank $6,525, by promissory note, payable four months after the 3d March, 1862, pledged as security therefor to the bank the note of J. D. & F. Hawkins, dated January 1, 1861, and one 1st March, 1862, for $9,333. The note *717of the Messrs. Hawkins was payable to J. 33. McLemore, and by Mm indorsed in blank. By the contract of pledge, wMch was in writing, if McLemore, Rayburn & Co. did not, at maturity, pay tkeir note, or any renewal thereof, then the president and cashier of the bank, or either, of them, as agents, were…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Olivera v. The Union Insurance CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1818

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Central Optical Merchandising Co. v. Estate of LoweMississippi Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Gables Racing Ass'n v. PerskySupreme Court of Florida · 1934
  3. Llano Granite & Marble Co. v. HollingerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
  4. Eckert v. SearcyMississippi Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Hibernia Bank & Trust Co. v. TurnerMississippi Supreme Court · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API