Legal Opinion

State v. Blankenship

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 1965No. 1469PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McFarland, Justice.

Appellants, Joe Ernest Blankenship and William Lee Blankenship, were charged and tried by a jury along with Winifred Obia Norris, on three felony counts, to-wit: obstructing justice, in violation of A.R.S. § 13-541; assault with intent to commit a felony, in violation of A.R.S. § 13-245, as amended; and, riot, in violation of A.R.S. § 13-631. A motion to dismiss all three counts was granted as to co-defendant Norris. The jury found both appellants guilty on each of the three counts. The court suspended sentence on the count for riot, reduced the other two counts to…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State v. PulliamArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  2. State v. VillavicencioArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Indian Fred v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1929
  4. State v. MangrumArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Everett v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1960

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. FisherArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. AxleyArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. DumaineArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Jones v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  5. State v. GansterArizona Supreme Court · 1967

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API