C. Wayne Clark v. Richard A. DiStefano
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.
¶ 1. Plaintiff Wayne Clark appeals the trial court's grant of summary judgment on statute of limitations grounds to defendant Richard DiStefano in connection with Clark's claim to collect on a promissory note. Clark argues that the court erroneously applied the six-year statute of limitations for demand notes found in the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), 9A V.S.A. § 3-118(b), rather than the fourteen-year statute of limitations for witnessed promissory notes, located in 12 V.S.A. § 508. We affirm.
¶ 2. The undisputed facts and disputed facts viewed in favor of Clark, as the nonmoving party, are…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re CarterSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
- Department of Taxes v. MurphySupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
- Mier's Admr. v. BoyerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1963
- Pike v. Chuck's Willoughby Pub, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2006
- Fleet National Bank v. LibertySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Johnathan J. Billewicz v. Town of Fair HavenSupreme Court of Vermont · 2021
- In Re Miriam Thomas (Paul Thomas, Appellant)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2026