Legal Opinion

C. Wayne Clark v. Richard A. DiStefano

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided August 10, 2018No. 2018-050PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

¶ 1. Plaintiff Wayne Clark appeals the trial court's grant of summary judgment on statute of limitations grounds to defendant Richard DiStefano in connection with Clark's claim to collect on a promissory note. Clark argues that the court erroneously applied the six-year statute of limitations for demand notes found in the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), 9A V.S.A. § 3-118(b), rather than the fourteen-year statute of limitations for witnessed promissory notes, located in 12 V.S.A. § 508. We affirm.

¶ 2. The undisputed facts and disputed facts viewed in favor of Clark, as the nonmoving party, are…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In re CarterSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
  2. Department of Taxes v. MurphySupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
  3. Mier's Admr. v. BoyerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1963
  4. Pike v. Chuck's Willoughby Pub, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2006
  5. Fleet National Bank v. LibertySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Johnathan J. Billewicz v. Town of Fair HavenSupreme Court of Vermont · 2021
  2. In Re Miriam Thomas (Paul Thomas, Appellant)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API