Legal Opinion

Cooley v. Foltz

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1891PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Error to St. Clair. (Canfield, J.) Case. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

This is an action of tort. The plaintiff's declaration contains two counts, — one for assault and battery; the other, malicious prosecution. Verdict and judgment were rendered in favor of defendant.

Plaintiff introduced one physician, known as an “ eclectic,” and who had never graduated at any regular school of medicine, who testified to her injuries. The defendant then introduced two physicians as witnesses who had been called to treat her both before and after the alleged trouble with the defendant. They obtained no knowledge of her ailments and condition except what they had obtained in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Briesenmeister v. Supreme Lodge Knights of Pythias of the WorldMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Merrill v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  2. Green v. Terminal RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  3. Sovereign Camp of Woodmen of the World v. GrandonNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Griggs v. Saginaw & Flint Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Vergin v. City of SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1901

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API