Legal Opinion

Smith v. Ihling

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1882PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Yan Burén. Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMarston, J.

This action was commenced in justice’s court by issuing a summons on a legal holiday, February 22, 1881. On the return day, a motion was made to .quash the proceedings which was denied, a trial was then had and judgment for the plaintiff. The cause was then taken to the circuit on a special aj>peal and the judgment of the justice reversed. The case comes here on writ of error.

The circuit court erred. The issuing of summons is a ministerial act and is not forbidden by the statute.

The judgment of the circuit must be reversed with costs.

The other Justices concurred.

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Reclamation District No. 535 v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Whipple v. HillNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Glenn v. EddySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1889
  4. Havens v. StilesIdaho Supreme Court · 1902
  5. A. G. Spalding & Bros. v. BernhardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API