Smith v. Ihling
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Yan Burén. Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMarston, J.
This action was commenced in justice’s court by issuing a summons on a legal holiday, February 22, 1881. On the return day, a motion was made to .quash the proceedings which was denied, a trial was then had and judgment for the plaintiff. The cause was then taken to the circuit on a special aj>peal and the judgment of the justice reversed. The case comes here on writ of error.
The circuit court erred. The issuing of summons is a ministerial act and is not forbidden by the statute.
The judgment of the circuit must be reversed with costs.
The other Justices concurred.
2Cited by6 opinions
- Reclamation District No. 535 v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Whipple v. HillNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
- Glenn v. EddySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1889
- Havens v. StilesIdaho Supreme Court · 1902
- A. G. Spalding & Bros. v. BernhardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.