Legal Opinion

Wright v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 27, 1988No. 3-87-199-CR, 3-87-200-CRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EARL W. SMITH, Justice.

In no. 3-87-199-CR, the district court found appellant guilty of delivery of less than 28 grams of methamphetamine, a controlled substance, and assessed punishment at imprisonment for ten years. Tex.Rev. Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 4476-15, § 4.03 (Supp. 1988). In no. 3-87-200-CR, a jury found appellant guilty of delivery of less than 28 grams of heroin, a controlled substance. Id. The court assessed punishment in this cause at imprisonment for ten years.

No. 3-87-199-CR

At the original trial of this cause, appellant entered a plea of guilty and judicially confessed. The district…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Davila v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  2. Burns v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
  3. Hubert v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1972
  4. Westfall v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1983
  5. State v. MaxwellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. PattioayHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Larry Charbert Hayes v. Warden Hawes and Neil F. Hartigan, Attorney General for the State of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  3. State v. Gunter, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1995
  4. State v. PattioayHawaii Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API