Legal Opinion

City of Cut Bank v. Tom Patrick Construction, Inc.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 1998No. 97-718PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Leaphart

¶1 City of Cut Bank (Cut Bank) appeals from the decision of the Ninth Judicial District Court, Glacier County, dismissing with prejudice Cut Bank’s complaint based upon the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Doctor’s Associates, Inc. v. Casarotto (1996), 517 U.S. 681, 116 S.Ct. 1652, 134 L.Ed.2d 902 (Casarotto). More specifically, the District Court determined that the transaction between Cut Bank and Tom Patrick Construction (Tom Patrick), which is the basis of the current action, involved interstate commerce and thus must be arbitrated pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA).…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Perry v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cowan v. CowanMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Anderson v. Recontrust Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Bar OK Ranch, Co. v. EhlertMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Abraham v. Hull & SwingleyMontana Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Chapman v. McVicherMontana Supreme Court · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API