Legal Opinion
Koken v. Fidelity Mutual Life Insurance
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided June 14, 2002PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
President Judge COLINS.
Before the Court for disposition is the request of the Insurance Commissioner of Pennsylvania, as statutory Rehabilitator of the Fidelity Mutual Life Insurance Company (Fidelity Mutual), 1 for approval of her Third Amended Plan of Rehabilitation, as modified (Plan). 2 Objections to the Plan have been filed by the Policyholders’ Committee that was appointed by the Court early on in these proceedings.
Only the most cursory history of these lengthy and complicated proceedings is necessary to our purposes here. Suffice it to say that, on the basis of its precarious…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- In Re Pacor, Inc. v. John Higgins, Jr. And Louise HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- In Re: Continental AirlinesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Zerand-Bernal Group, Inc. v. CoxCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Callaway v. BentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Koken v. SteinbergCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Koken v. Colonial Assurance Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Consedine v. Penn Treaty Network America InsuranceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Koken v. Fidelity Mutual Life InsuranceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Ario v. Fidelity Mutual Life InsuranceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.