Legal Opinion

Wurts v. Reily

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County

Decided March 11, 1929Published

1Opinion of the Court

Fox, J.,

This matter comes before us upon a bill and answer.

*526The bill, in substance, avers that the plaintiffs, Elizabeth Wister Wurts, Sarah Logan Wister Starr and Margaret Wister Meigs, are, and at the time of the death of the testatrix became, the owners in fee simple of an undivided one-half interest in two tracts of land, with buildings thereon erected, situate in the City of Harrisburg, being known as Nos. 902 and 904 North Second Street; that plaintiffs, C. Stewart Wurts, James Starr and Edward B. Meigs, are the respective husbands of Elizabeth Wister Wurts, Sarah Logan Wister Starr and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
  2. Reiff v. PepoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Kemp v. ReinhardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  4. Chambers v. Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  5. Curtis v. LongstrethSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1863

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API