Legal Opinion
NJ DIV. OF MOTOR VEHICLES v. Ripley
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 26, 2003PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
835 A.2d 1252 (2003)
364 N.J. Super. 343
NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLES, Petitioner-Respondent,
v.
Paul D. RIPLEY, Respondent-Appellant.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued October 1, 2003.
Decided November 26, 2003.
Bernard H. Shihar, Metuchen, argued the cause for appellant (Convery, Convery & Shihar, attorneys; Mr. Shihar, on the brief).
Emily H. Armstrong, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Peter C. Harvey, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Patrick DeAlmeida, Deputy Attorney General, of counsel; Sue Kleinberg, Deputy Attorney General, on…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
- Mayflower Securities Co. v. Bureau of SecuritiesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Henry v. Rahway State PrisonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- State v. ValentinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- State v. LivingstonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. ZeikelNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011
- State v. PepeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
- JOHN F. MIZE VS. NEW JERSEY MOTOR VEHICLE COMMISSION (NEW JERSEY MOTOR VEHICLE COMMISSION)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018
- KEITH C. HELD VS. NEW JERSEY MOTOR VEHICLE COMMISSION (NEW JERSEY MOTOR VEHICLE COMMISSION)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019