Legal Opinion

Durante v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 11, 1973No. 6642PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

Charged with grand larceny and unauthorized use of an automobile, appellant pleaded not guilty. Three months later at the conclusion of a pretrial “identification” hearing, appellant withdrew his plea of not guilty and entered a plea of guilty to the grand larceny charge. The other charge was dismissed. Prior to imposition of sentence appellant through new counsel sought to withdraw his plea of guilty. As grounds for the relief sought, he alleged that at the time of pleading guilty he lacked effective assistance of counsel, that he was in “fear” of the Court, and that he was undergoing…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kercheval v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Commonwealth v. ForbesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Charles Daniel Everett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
  4. United States v. Manuel R. SambroCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
  5. United States v. Leonard YoungCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Gooding v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Jordan v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Pierce v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Lorimer v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Austin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API