Legal Opinion

Halferty v. Wilmering

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 5, 1885PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF IOWA. The facts that make the case are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matthews

The plaintiff in error, who was plaintiff below, sued to recover damages for an alleged breach of a written contract, entered into at Chicago, for the sale and delivery of 1,000 hogs, to average 250 pounds or over, to be delivered at Plattsburg, Missouri, in the month of December, 1876, at the seller’s option, at $1.50 per hundred gross weight. The contract contained the following clause:

“ Each party hereby agrees to deposit one thousand dollars ($1,000) each in the Union Stock Yard National Bank for the faithful performance of the above contract, the thousand dollars to be forfeited to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Blackshire v. Iowa Homestead Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1874
  2. Stier v. City of OskaloosaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
  3. Mayes v. TurleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
  4. Gates v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  5. Coates v. Galena & Chicago Union RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Treasure State Industries, Inc. v. LeiglandMontana Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Moore v. SchoenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1942
  3. Goodman Associates, LLC v. Winter Quarters, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API