Legal Opinion
Daigle v. Phillips Petroleum Co.
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Decided February 2, 1995No. 01-93-00880-CVPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
OLIVER-PARROTT, Chief Justice.
Appellee’s motion for rehearing is overruled. Our opinion of December 15, 1994, is withdrawn and the following is substituted in its place.
The appellant, Floyd W. Daigle, appeals from a motion for summary judgment granted in favor of the appellee, Phillips Petroleum Company. We reverse and remand for a trial on the merits.
Facts asserted in the summary judgment proof are as follows. Floyd Daigle was employed by Phillips 66 at its Houston Chemical Complex in Pasadena, Texas. On October 23, 1989, Daigle was at home in LaPorte when an…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Boyles v. KerrTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Tobin v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 1958
- Williams v. GlashTexas Supreme Court · 1990
- Continental Casing Corp. v. Samedan Oil Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wendy Paola Destefano v. Children's National Medical CenterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- Campus Management, Inc. v. KimballCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Allen v. Albright, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2001
- Migliori v. Airborne Freight Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1997
- Bradley A. Jacobson v. Avi Ron and Delaney Construction Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2009