Legal Opinion

People v. Hurlburt-Anderson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 21, 2007PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from an order of the Ontario County Court (Craig J. Doran, J.), entered December 30, 2004. The order determined that defendant is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: On appeal from an order determining that she is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law § 168 et seq.), defendant contends that County Court’s determination of her risk level is not supported by the requisite clear and convincing…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. DexterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. People v. McDanielAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. People v. DubuqueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. People v. WilbertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  5. People v. FerraraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. YoungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. People v. ThomasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. People v. LerchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  4. People v. LewisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  5. People v. BakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API