Legal Opinion
Wilson v. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 20, 1996No. 95-70403Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
104 F.3d 366
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
James A. WILSON, Sr., d/b/a Modern Locker Plant and/or
Cattlemen's Co-op; Yellowstone Meat Co.; Rudolph
G. Stanko a/k/a "Butch Stanko", Petitioners,
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, Respondent.
No. 95-70403.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 16, 1996.*
Decided Dec. 20, 1996.
On Petition for Review…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Farley and Calfee, Inc. v. U.S. Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Spencer Livestock Commission Company Mike Donaldson v. Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Melvyn Siegel v. Richard E. Lyng, Secretary of Agriculture United States Department of Agriculture and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- Pittsburgh Melting Co. v. TottenSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Windy City Meat Co., Inc. v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991