Legal Opinion

Butler v. Dobbins

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided May 27, 1947PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThaxter, J.

The plaintiffs brought a bill in equity for the *384construction of the third and fourth paragraphs of the will of Rose D. Mansur late of Houlton. From a decree which sustained the bill and the contentions of the plaintiffs with respect to the will, the defendant has appealed. There is no dispute as to the. facts.

The plaintiffs were the daughters of Walter P. Mansur, the husband of the testatrix by a former marriage; the defendant, who is the executor and residuary legatee under her will, was her brother. The third and fourth clauses of the will and the tenth clause which disposes of the residue…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chase National Bank v. DeichmillerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
  2. Palmer v. Estate of PalmerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1909
  3. Gorham v. ChadwickSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1938
  4. Maxim v. MaximSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1930
  5. Spinney v. EatonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re Vail's EstateSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  2. First Portland National Bank v. Kaler-Vaill Memorial HomeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1959
  3. Shriners Hospitals for Crippled Children v. EmrieSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
  4. WACHOVIA BANK & TRUST COMPANY v. DodsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. Forbes v. BurketDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API