Legal Opinion

Hershel Rich, Linda Rich and Color Unlimited, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Company, a Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided December 6, 1978No. 78-1195PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Per curiam

This action was brought by Color Unlimited, Inc. to recover damages it allegedly suffered due to the failure of certain photography equipment to perform as advertised or warranted. Liability of Eastman Kodak, Inc. (Kodak) was premised on negligent misrepresentations claimed to have been made by Kodak concerning the nature and capabilities of the equipment as well as the quality of Kodak’s repair service. In addition, the complaint alleged that Kodak failed to exercise due care in providing repair service for the equipment. Some of the equipment was purchased directly from Kodak and the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Coonis v. RogersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  2. Shelby County R-IV School District v. HermanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  3. Morrow v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1909
  4. Klapmeier v. Telecheck International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
  5. Rich v. Eastman Kodak Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America v. JustissTexas Supreme Court · 2012
  2. James T. Crues, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Kfc Corporation, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  3. NCRIC, Inc. v. Columbia Hospital for Women Medical Center, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Cargill, Incorporated v. Taylor Towing Service, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  5. Midwest Printing, Inc. v. Am International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API