Legal Opinion

State v. Otten

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 3, 1972No. 42521PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

Appeal from a judgment of conviction after jury trial on an information charging defendant with the offense of sodomy upon or with a child. Minn. St. 609.293, subd. 4(3). Defendant asserts that the “complainant mistakenly identified him” and that he [defendant] “convincingly established an alibi.”

From the record it appears that, on the evening of September 20, 1969, complainant, a 14-year-old girl, and her girl friend, while walking on their way to attend a high school fooball game, were hailed by three boys in an automobile, who invited them to a party. One of the occupants of the car was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. NorgaardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  2. State Ex Rel. Trimble v. HedmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  3. Cady v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  4. State v. SuttonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  5. State v. MarkusonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. CaronSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  2. State v. MilesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  3. State of Minnesota v. Eddie Matthew MosleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  4. State v. OatesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  5. State v. YangCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API