Legal Opinion
Morrison v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 30, 2021No. Civil Action No. 2019-1838Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WILLIAM T. MORRISON, JR., Plaintiff, v. Case No. 19-cv-1838 (CRC) FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Federal inmate William T. Morrison, Jr., proceeding pro se, filed suit alleging that the Federal Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) has mismanaged the treatment of his high cholesterol. He requests a declaratory judgment stating that he is entitled to receive the nutritional supplement Coenzyme Q10 (“CoQ10”) as part of his treatment. Although Morrison’s Amended Complaint is somewhat unclear, the Court construes his claim as…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Helling v. McKinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Chance v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Baker v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.