Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gleason v. San Pedro, L. A. & S. L. R.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1917No. 2971Published

Appeal from District Court, Third District; Hon. Geo. G. Armstrong, Judge. Action by T. H. Gleason against the San Pedro, Los An-geles & Salt Lake Railroad Company. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

1DissentMeCARTY, J.

I am of the opinion that there is no prejudicial error assigned, and that the judgment should be affirmed. The jury assessed plaintiff’s damages at $500, and rendered a verdict for that amount, with interest thereon from the date of the fire. The evidence, without conflict, shows that the fire in question destroyed property belonging to plaintiff as follows: Fifteen rods of corral fence described as “ a good board fence, cedar posts with two rails along the posts and then boards,” 4-J feet high, of the market value of $75; one set of harness of the market value of $30; one wagon jack of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Olmstead v. Oregon Short Line RailroadUtah Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Preece v. Rio Grande Western Railway Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API