Legal Opinion

Ungray Lamar Murray v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 14, 2015No. 4D13-2527PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGross, J.

Ungray Murray appeals his conviction for sexual battery, contending the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress DNA evidence obtained pursuant to a search warrant because the affidavit in support of the warrant contained intentional misstatements and omissions. While the affidavit contained several misleading statements, we nevertheless affirm for two reasons. First, under the inevitable discovery doctrine, since the DNA evidence recovered from the crime scene matched Murray’s DNA as uploaded to the nationwide CODIS registry, Murray’s DNA connection to the victim would eventually…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Pagan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  5. United States v. James Edward Colkley, United States of America v. Jamison Henry JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harder v. EdwardsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  2. STATE OF FLORIDA v. JASON LUIS DOMENECHDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024
  3. Samuel M. Hewitt v. Ramone K. Hibbert, Carlos A. Rivera Saez, Chad Chronister, and Hillsborough County Sheriff’s OfficeDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2026
  4. William Harder, an individually, and as a Detective with the City of Fort Lauderdale Police Department, the TJX Companies, Inc. and Derek Carlson v. LaToya EdwardsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API