Legal Opinion

Monaco v. Canty

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 21, 1997PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bruno, J.), dated April 30, 1996, which, upon a jury verdict awarding the plaintiff Elizabeth Monaco $50,000 for past pain and suffering, $200,000 for future pain and suffering, $45,000 for past medical expenses, $140,800 for future medical expenses, and $421,200 for future loss of earnings, is in favor of the plaintiff Elizabeth Monaco and against them.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the facts and as an exercise of discretion, by deleting the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nicastro v. ParkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. Vebeliunas v. American National Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. Chase v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. Peck v. Bon Aire Condominium IV Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Toppin v. Capan Contracting Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Outar v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. Rhames v. Supermarkets General Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API