Legal Opinion
Hancock v. City of Anchorage
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided March 8, 1957PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILLIKEN, Chief Justice.
The question presented on this appeal is whether an action may be maintained against a city for an injury growing out of a condition in a public sidewalk — a loose lid or top on a city-owned water meter box —when notice of the injury was not served on the city within 90 days of the occurrence of the injury in accordance with the governing statute, KRS 411.110, which reads:
“No action shall be maintained against any city in this state because of any injury growing out of any defect in the condition of any bridge, street, sidewalk, alley or other public thoroughfare,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Peoples v. City of ValparaisoIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
- Galloway v. City of WinchesterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945
- Baker v. Town of ManitouCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
- Collins v. City of MemphisDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1936
- Wellman v. City of OwensboroCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1955
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kelleher v. Ephrata School District No. 165Washington Supreme Court · 1960
- Krietemeyer v. City of MadisonvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2018
- McIntosh v. Electric & Water Plant BoardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1965
- Richard Jones v. City of Paducah, McCracken County, KentuckyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2021