Legal Opinion

Bruce v. Ford

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1924No. 22781Published

1Opinion of the Court

Redick, District Judge.

The petition in this ease declares upon a contract for the loan of money by the plaintiff to the defendant at the defendant’s request. The answer of the defendant contains a general denial, and alleges the invalidity of the contract, asserting that the transaction referred to in the plaintiff’s petition as a loan was in fact a gambling transaction involving trades in wheat upon the Chicago Board of Trade, in which the delivery of the wheat was not contemplated by either party, but that settlement was to be made, whether a profit or loss, upon the difference between the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Atkins v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1870
  2. Jose v. HewettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1861
  3. Boon v. GoochNebraska Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Sunderland & Saunders v. HibbardNebraska Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API