Legal Opinion

Pensacola Electric Terminal Railway Co. v. Haussman

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 15, 1906PublishedCited by 5 opinions

This case was decided by Division A. Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Escambia County. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtCockrell, J.

The declaration in this case, consisting of three counts, alleges in each that Haussman while a passenger o.n a street car was by the negligent operation of the car thrown from the car and injured. The defendant pleaded the general issue and that the injury was caused solely by plaintiff’s negligence.

There was much testimony tending to show that the plaintiff was not thrown from the ear but jumped and the court charged that an unnecessary jumping off the car would defeat recovery, but also charged “If, however, the plaintiff was placed by the negligence of the defendant company in a situation…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Parrish v. Pensacola & Atlantic RailroadSupreme Court of Florida · 1891
  2. Hinote v. BrigmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1902
  3. Wilkinson v. Pensacola & Atlantic RailroadSupreme Court of Florida · 1895
  4. Jacksonville, Tampa & Key West Railway Co. v. NeffSupreme Court of Florida · 1891
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. GuytonSupreme Court of Florida · 1904

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Southern Home Insurance v. PutnalSupreme Court of Florida · 1909
  2. Ingram-Dekle Lumber Co. v. GeigerSupreme Court of Florida · 1916
  3. Tampa Transit Lines v. CorbinSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
  4. Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1911
  5. Purpura Bros. v. OxnerSupreme Court of Florida · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API