Legal Opinion

City of Scranton v. E.B. Jermyn Lodge No. 2

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 29, 2014PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge SIMPSON.

These consolidated cross-appeals, involving the City of Scranton (City) and its police personnel, originating in a February 2009 interest arbitration award (2009 Award) issued under the statute commonly known as the Policemen and Firemen Collective Bargaining Act or Act 111 (Act 111),1 return to us from our Supreme Court. On remand, we address retirement benefits.

I. Background

A. Procedure

By way of brief procedural summary, a series of interest arbitration awards between the City, designated a distressed municipality pursuant to the Municipalities Financial Recovery…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Chirico v. BD. OF SUP'RS FOR NEWTON TP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Borough of Ellwood City v. Ellwood City Police Department Wage & Policy UnitSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Lee v. Municipality of Bethel ParkCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Shippensburg Police Ass'n v. Borough of ShippensburgCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. City of Erie v. International Ass'n of Firefighters Local 293Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. S. Sheppleman v. City of Chester Aggregated Pension FundCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  2. S. Sheppleman v. City of Chester Aggregated Pension FundCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API