Legal Opinion

Sinclaire v. Elderhostel, Inc.

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided August 13, 2012No. Docket 30,089PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRY, Judge.

{1} In this case we consider what our Legislature intended when it enacted the statute requiring employers to pay overtime wages for hours worked in excess of forty hours in “any week of seven days.” We conclude that “any week of seven days” means a fixed and regularly recurring workweek established by an employer consistent with the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and regulations promulgated under the authority of the FLSA. We reject Plaintiff Peter Sinclaire’s argument that the employer’s workweek, for purposes of calculating overtime pay, should change each time…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bishop v. Evangelical Good Samaritan SocietyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Director, Labor & Industrial Division, New Mexico Department of Labor v. Echostar Communications Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Christus St. Vincent Reg'l Med. Ctr. v. Duarte-AfarNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Kerbes v. Raceway Associates, LLCAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  5. New Mexico Department of Labor v. A.C. Electric, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rivera v. McCoy Corp.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2017
  2. International Chiropractors Ass'n v. New Mexico Board of Chiropractic ExaminersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Segura v. J.W. Drilling, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. Int'l Chiropractors Ass'n v. N.M. Bd. of Chiropractic Exam'rsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Segura v. J.W. Drilling, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API