Legal Opinion
Edwards v. C&D Unlimited, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 3, 2002PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant C&D Unlimited, Inc., appeals, as limited by its notice of *311appeal and brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Kitson, J.), dated February 6, 2001, as granted the plaintiffs’ cross motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability on their Labor Law § 241 (6) claims.
Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and the cross motion is denied.
Generally, Labor Law § 241 (6) imposes a nondelegable duty of reasonable care upon an owner or…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rizzuto v. L.A. Wenger Contracting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Long v. Forest-FehlhaberNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Lorefice v. Reckson Operating Partnership, L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Amirr v. Calcagno Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
3Cited by8 opinions
- Melchor v. SinghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Hricus v. Aurora Contractors, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Fusca v. A & S ConstructionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Bradley v. Morgan Stanley & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Riffo-Velozo v. Village of ScarsdaleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.