Gerrish v. Seaton
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from, Linn District Gourt — Hon. James I). Giffen, J udge. This is an action by wbick the plaintiff seeks to enjoin the collection of a judgment against him, which he alleges to be void. There was a decree in the court below for the plaintiff, and. defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtRothrook, J.
X. judgment: without t?ne askie-13^' barrec?by6M statute. I. It appears from the evidence in the case that on the 24th day of February, 1869, the plaintiff and one Gleason executed a promissory note to , , -1 '' the defendant Hunt for ®6o2, payable m twelve months, with interest at the rate of 10 per cent Per annum. An action was brought upon said note by Hunt in the Linn district court, in which action both the plaintiff and Gleason were named as defendants. A formal judgment was rendered against both the plaintiff and Gleason, in April, 1810, for the amount of the note, with interest and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Gerrish v. HuntSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
3Cited by6 opinions
- Massachusetts Benefit Life Ass'n v. LohmillerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1896
- Brandt v. LittleWashington Supreme Court · 1907
- Jamison v. WeaverSupreme Court of Iowa · 1892
- Uehlein v. BurkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- Christensen v. EsbeckSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.