Legal Opinion
Holsey v. Collins
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided March 17, 1983No. Civ. No. W-78-861PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WATKINS, Senior District Judge.
In Holsey v. Collins, 90 F.R.D. 122 (D.Md.1981), this Court ruled that pro se plaintiff Aaron Holsey's noncompliance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rules of the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, and numerous court orders justified the dismissal of his complaint, but that it would grant Holsey additional time to motion for leave to amend and submit a proposed amended complaint in order to rectify these defects. Holsey failed to file such a motion within the time allotted and the Court subsequently dismissed…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Nial Ruth Cox v. A. M. Stanton, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
- Paris Reizakis v. Albert E. LoyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974
- Robert Cramer v. B. L. CrutchfieldCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
- Holsey v. CollinsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1981
- Holsey v. BassDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Snead v. Automation Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1984
- Aerodyne Systems Engineering, Ltd. v. Heritage International BankDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1987