Legal Opinion

Lilly v. . West

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1887PublishedCited by 6 opinions

This was a civil action, tried before Clark, Judge, at October Term, 1886, of Sampson Superior Court. Judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff, from which the defendants appealed. The facts are sufficiently-stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.

The partnership firm of tl. & E. Lilly, in an action instituted upon a promissory note executed by R. C. Lee & Co. and W. P. Beaman for $1,452.99, dated March 27, 1861, and due at two months, recovered judgment which was docketed on November 1, 1789, against the defendants R. C. Lee, W. P. Beaman, Noel Jones and Blackman Lee, the members constitutiug R. C. Lee & Co., and the said W. P. Beaman, personally. Blackman Lee died on August 80th, 1877, and the defendants in this action became by appointment under his will his executors, and qualified as such. On October 31st, 1879, the plaintiffs…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McDonald v. . DicksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  2. Lytle v. . LytleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  3. McDonald v. . DicksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  4. Mauney v. . HolmesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  5. Ashcraft v. . LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Adams v. . GuySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  2. McIlhenny v. Wilmington Savings & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  3. Aldridge v. . DixonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  4. Ex parte SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  5. Smith Ex ParteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API