Legal Opinion

Van Houtum v. Campos

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided May 5, 2000No. 9905817CPublished

1Opinion of the CourtKern, J.

The plaintiff, Diana Van Houtum (“Van Houtum”), brought this action against defendant Edimar Campos alleging various claims for relief based on a pervasive, willful and knowing scheme that resulted in a fraud on the court in the proceeding entitled Campos v. Van Houtum, C.A. 93-03902 (“1993 action”). Van Houtum also seeks relief against defendant Workers’ Compensation Trust Fund (“Trust Fund”) alleging breach of obligation (Count VII), breach of fiduciary duty (Count VIII), fraud (Count IX), and violation of civil rights (Count X). The Trust Fund moves to dismiss Van Houtum’s claims against…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Nader v. CitronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  3. Eyal v. Helen Broadcasting Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  4. Whitney v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  5. Bell v. MazzaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API