Sorbee International Ltd. v. Chubb Custom Insurance
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BECK, J.:
• ¶ 1 We address in the context of an insurance policy the meaning of the term “misappropriation of advertising ideas.” We affirm the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant-ap-pellee Chubb Custom Insurance Company (“Chubb”).
¶ 2 Appellant Sorbee International Limited (“Sorbee”) makes hard candy, and so does its competitor, Simply Lite Food Corporation (“Simply Lite”). Sorbee brought an action against Simply Lite in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. Simply Lite filed a counterclaim against Sorbee in the New York litigation…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Gedeon v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Riccio v. American Republic InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Bateman v. Motorists Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Scopel v. Donegal Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Britamco Underwriters, Inc. v. GrzeskiewiczSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- The Frog, Switch & Manufacturing Co., Inc., in No. 98-7552 v. The Travelers Insurance Company (d.c. Civ. No. 98-Cv-00643) the Frog, Switch & Manufacturing Co., Inc., in No. 98-7553 v. United States Fire Insurance Company (d.c. Civ. No. 98-Cv-00758)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Lexmark International, Inc. v. Transportation InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
- Cat Internet Services, Inc., Internet Supply, Inc. v. Providence Washington Insurance Co., York Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Rahemtulla v. HassamDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- Conquest v. WMC Mortgage Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.