Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Homes v. Jones

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 6, 1967No. 5-4163PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1ConcurrenceCarleton Harris, Chief Justice

On petition for rehearing, an entirely new argument is presented by appellant. The argument is relevant to the issue in the litigation, but I do not think that it can properly be considered. For the first time, it is urged that Act 459 of 1965 was passed as a matter of enabling the Insurance Commissioner to adopt the N.A.I.C. regulations. Appellant, in its rehearing brief, says:

“Act 459 represents the legislation necessary to enable the Insurance Commissioner to adopt the N.A.I.C. regulations. The Commissioner is directed by sub-paragraph 5 of the Act to conform to the regulations adopted by…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API