Legal Opinion
Myers v. City of Calipatria
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 2, 1934No. Civ. No. 1096PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MUNDO, J., pro tem.
The plaintiff had been serving the City of Calipatria as its elected city clerk at a salary fixed by ordinance in the sum of $100 per month. By the same ordinance the salary of its deputy city clerk was fixed at $80 per month, the salary of its city attorney at $75 per month, and the salary of the deputy tax collector at $75 per month.
On April 19, 1928, while the plaintiff was so serving as city clerk, the following minute order was made and entered by the city council of defendant city: “On motion of Councilman Montgomery, seconded by Councilman Gullet, and carried, P. N.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- City of Lexington v. RennickCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899
- Bucknall v. StoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
- Be Boest v. GambellOregon Supreme Court · 1899
- Hobbs v. . the City of YonkersNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Nelson v. City of SuperiorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Leeper v. BeltramiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Comet Theatre Enterprises, Inc. v. CartwrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- Holm v. BramwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Raymond v. ChristianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Wright v. Village of WilderIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.