Legal Opinion

Linda and Randy Arhart v. Micro Switch Manufacturing Company, a Division of Honeywell, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided September 4, 1986No. 86-1002PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BATTEY, District Judge.

I. NATURE OF CASE

The plaintiffs Linda and Randy Arhart appeal from entry of judgment on a take-nothing jury verdict in a products liability action. Jurisdiction is based on diversity, 28 U.S.C. § 1332.

The plaintiffs appeal from the district court’s 1 method of treatment of the settling tortfeasors and the instructions to the jury given during the course of and at the conclusion of the trial. During the trial the court advised the jury of the fact that two joint tortfeasors had settled the plaintiffs’ claim. The amount and terms of the settlement were not revealed to the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. James Leroy Jackson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corporation and Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  2. James Leroy Jackson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corporation and Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  3. Walton v. TullSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
  4. Woodard v. HollidaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
  5. Arkansas Kraft Corporation v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Alexander v. CahillSupreme Court of Delaware · 2003
  2. Bragg v. Mayes, Sudderth & Etheredge, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  3. RightCHOICE Managed Care, Inc. v. Hospital Partners, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API