Legal Opinion

State v. Paul

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided January 8, 2003No. S-2002-547PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMARY OPINION ON RESERVED QUESTION OF LAW

CHAPEL, Judge.

¶ 1 James Paul was charged with Trafficking in Illegal Drugs (Marijuana) in violation of 63 O.S.2001, § 2-415, in the District Court of Beckham County, Case No. CF-2001-81. A jury trial was held. At the close of the State’s evidence, the Honorable Joe L. Jackson raised a Motion to Suppress, suppressed the evidence, dismissed the case, and exonerated Paul’s bond. The State appeals from this decision on a reserve question of law. 1

¶ 2 The State raises two related issues: Does the alert of a drug-detecting dog give an officer probable…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. California v. CarneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. United States v. Denny Ray HunnicuttCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  5. United States v. Adela Morales-Zamora, United States of America v. Javier Ozuna-Fuentes and Jose Manuel Morales-DiazCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. DuranNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Seabolt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006
  3. Gomez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2007
  4. State v. BassCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2013
  5. State v. GoinsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API