Legal Opinion
Ramey & Mathis, Inc. v. Pitts
Texas Supreme Court
Decided June 20, 1950No. A-2598PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brewster
By an original petition for mandamus Ramey & Mathis, Inc., seeks to compel the Court of Civil Appeals at Amarillo to certify certain questions of venue in a case decided by that court where in Ramey & Mathis is appellant and D. W. Page and Eagle Indemnity Co. are appellees. See 226 S. W. 2d, 976.
Appellant maintains its principal office in Potter County, Texas. Page resides in Hutchinson County. Eagle Indemnity Co. is incorporated under the laws of New York, where its principal office is, but it has a permit to do business in Texas and maintains an agency in Potter County.
March 22, 1946,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Empire Gas & Fuel Co. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1932
- Union Bus Lines v. ByrdTexas Supreme Court · 1944
- Pioneer Building & Loan Ass'n v. GrayTexas Supreme Court · 1939
- Commonwealth Bank & Trust Co. v. Heid Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1932
- Ramey & Mathis, Inc. v. PittsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Ladner v. Reliance Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1956
- Liles v. Winters Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
- Friday v. Grant Plaza Huntsville AssociatesTexas Supreme Court · 1980
- McCormick v. Vernon Butler Chevrolet Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1963
- C. Hayman Construction Co. v. American Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1971
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.