Legal Opinion

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of O'Neill

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided July 15, 1899Published

Exceptions to the report of a referee.

1Opinion of the Court

Varnum, S.

This is one of the undecided matters of Surrogate Arnold. The main question presented by the exceptions to the referee’s report relates to the charges made to the accountant by his attorneys. A very bitter personal controversy between the special guardian who raises this issue and these attorneys has arisen, and I have, in consequence, been burdened with briefs that were unnecessarily lengthy. I am convinced that the professional services that were rendered were characterized by skill and ability. The attorneys consumed much time in the performance of their duties, and their efforts…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Randall v. . PackardNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. People v. Bond Street Savings BankNew York Supreme Court · 1881

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API