Legal Opinion

People v. Deininger

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 23, 1940No. Crim. 2106PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.

This appeal taken by notice in open court by defendants Deininger and Turner, charged jointly with one Zimmerman, is from a judgment of conviction of grand theft and from orders denying motions of the two appellants for new trials.

The facts of the case are as follows: The complaining witness E. L. Mathewson conducted a used ear business in the city of Oakland. On March 30, 1939, defendant and appellant Deininger, codefendant Zimmerman, and a seventeen-year-old boy, one Stratton, started in Zimmerman’s ear for Mathewson’s place of business. About two blocks from the place, the Stratton boy was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. People v. GilbertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. JeffriesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  2. People v. RainesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  3. People v. HollandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. People v. OronaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. People v. ZervasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API