Legal Opinion

Hammers v. Southern Express Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 12, 1920PublishedCited by 4 opinions

A Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; F. M. Eobles, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Whitfield. J.

The declaration herein in effect alleges “that heretofore, to-wit, on the 2nd day of April, 1917, the said defendant’ was a common carrier of goods and chattels for hire, in and by a certain train of railway cars and in and by certain express cars, from a certain place, to-wit, from the City of Tampa, in the State of Florida, to a certain other place, to-wit, to the City of New York, in the State of New York. And the defendant being such carrier as aforesaid, the plaintiff heretofore, to-wit, on the day, month and year first aforesaid, át the special instance and request of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kurtz v. MoffittSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. United States v. DoremusSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Spalding v. PrestonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1848
  4. American Express Co. v. MullinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  5. Getchell v. PageSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1908

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Realty Bond & Share Co. v. EnglarSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  2. Pitts v. Howe Scale Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1938
  3. McDaniel v. HarrellSupreme Court of Florida · 1921
  4. Winchester v. HakSupreme Court of Florida · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API