Legal Opinion

Keisha Archibald, et al. v. David C. Banks, et al.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 8, 2025No. 1:24-cv-05919Unknown

1Opinion

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #: ccna conn □□□ nnnnnn naan DATE FILED:_ 9/8/2025 KEISHA ARCHIBALD, et al., : Plaintiffs, : : 24-cv-5919 (LJL) -V- : : OPINION AND ORDER DAVID C. BANKS, et al., : Defendants. : LEWIS J. LIMAN, United States District Judge: Plaintiff Keisha Archibald (“Plaintiff”), individually and as parent and natural guardian of N.A., brings this action challenging the decision of a state review officer (“SRO”) finding that her child N.A. was denied a free appropriate public education (“FAPE”) but nonetheless denying funding for one-to-one (“1:1”)…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Honig v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. School Committee of the Town of Burlington v. Department of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Florence County School District Four v. Carter Ex Rel. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API