Legal Opinion

Aston v. O'Carroll

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 28, 1946No. Civ. A. No. 2642PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEAHY, District Judge.*

Plaintiffs are dissatisfied with the results of the annual meeting of defendant’s stockholders. The prayer o.f the complaint is that the present directors be restrained from acting as such, that a new election for directors be held, under the supervision of the court, by the appointment of a master to conduct a new meeting of stockholders. In the interim, a receiver pendente lite is sought.

1. At this stage of the proceeding, defendant O’Carroll, a resident 'of Massachusetts, is beyond reach of process. A money judgment is sought against him. This action is brought under…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Langfelder v. Universal Laboratories, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1944
  2. Harr v. Pioneer Mechanical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
  3. Hopkins v. Great Western Fuse Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Kelly v. Brackenridge B. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Dallasega v. Victoria Amusement Enterprises, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1942

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re M. J. Johnson Aircraft Mfg. Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1953
  2. Ellsworth v. Carr-Consol. Biscuit Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
  3. Marcus Gumz, Cross-Appellant v. Douglas Morrissette and Lawrence Cloutier, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API