Legal Opinion

Coughlin Mfg. Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided July 13, 1951No. C. D. 1345PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Olivee, Chief Judge:

The merchandise involved in these protests is cellophane sheets assessed for duty at 40 cents per pound under the provisions of paragraph 31 (b) (1), .Tariff Act of 1930. It is claimed properly dutiable at 45 per centum ad valorem under the provisions of paragraph 31 (c) of the same act.

Paragraph 31 (b) (1), under which these sheets were assessed for duty, provides, so far as is pertinent to this issue, for “All compounds of cellulose * * *”:(1) In blocks, sheets, rods, tubes, powder, flakes, briquets, or other forms, * * * not made into finished or partly finished…

2Cited by25 opinions

  1. A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  2. Bleyco Paper Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  3. Bleyco Paper Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  4. Bleyco Paper Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  5. Bleyco Paper Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API