Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Escobar

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 18, 2018No. SJC 12430PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

RESCRIPT

So ordered .

The now well-known saga surrounding the Hinton drug lab stemmed from the egregious misconduct of former laboratory employee Annie Dookhan. See, e.g., Bridgeman v. District Attorney for the Suffolk Dist ., 476 Mass. 298 , 300, 67 N.E.3d 673 (2017) (setting forth protocol to address legacy of Dookhan's misconduct and to protect rights of affected defendants). Although the samples in Escobar's case were analyzed at the Hinton drug lab, in December, 2008, they were not analyzed by Dookhan. Escobar, therefore, is not among the thousands of defendants whose cases have thus far…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ScottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  2. Bridgeman v. District Attorney for the Suffolk DistrictMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2017
  3. Commonwealth v. WareMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
  4. Commonwealth v. CottoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. JeannisMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API