Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided June 9, 1949No. Docket No. 15634Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION.

OppeR, Judge-.

Section 22 (b) (1) and (2) of the Internal Revenue Code,1 which is involved here, deals in terms with three types of contract — life insurance, annuity, and endowment. Subsection (b) (1), covering amounts received under a life insurance contract paid by reason of the death of the insured, is concededly inapplicable. Cf. Grace R. Maxson Hall, 12 T. C. 419. Subsection (b) (2) refers in its first sentence to “Amounts received * * * under a life insurance * * * contract,” but excepts “amounts received as annuities” thereunder. Its second sentence prescribes the treatment of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Helvering v. Stockholms Enskilda BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Burnet v. WhitehouseSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Thornley v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1943
  4. Igleheart v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1948
  5. Shelley v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API