Hidalgo County Water Improvement Dist. No. 2 v. Cameron County Water Control & Improvement Dist. No. 5
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Dissent
W. O. MURRY, Chief Justice ing).
(dissent-
I do not concur in the opinion of the majority.
There can be no doubt but that the allegations of plaintiffs’ petition presented a real emergency existing in the Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas, due to the drought and the scant flow of water in the Rio Grande River, upon which so many people are dependent for water, not only for irrigation but also for domestic, municipal, industrial and other purposes.
The trial court first met this emergency by the granting of a temporary restraining order under the provisions of Rule 680, T.R.C.P., which could…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Morrow v. CorbinTexas Supreme Court · 1933
- McArthur v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Motl v. BoydTexas Supreme Court · 1926
- James v. E. Weinstein & SonsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
- Miller & Lux v. Madera Canal & Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.