Legal Opinion

Weiner v. Director of Division of Employment Security

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 8, 1951PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.

Unemployment compensation began in Massachusetts with St. 1935, c. 479, inserting by § 5 a new chapter in the General Laws, called c. 151A. A substitute for that new chapter was provided by St. 1937, c. 421, § 1. That substitute chapter was itself repealed by St. 1941, c. 685, § 1, and a new c. 151A was provided. This with later amendments constitutes the present law.

Contributions are required to be paid into a fund, to be used for the benefit of employees who lose their employment. In Howes Brothers Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Commission, 296 Mass. 275, the statute was upheld as an…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Howes Bros. v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  2. Wagstaff v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  3. Corrado v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  4. Putnam v. LangleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
  5. Home Owners' Loan Corp. v. SweeneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gentile v. Director of Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
  2. Bogdanowicz v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
  3. Weiner v. DIRECTOR OF THE DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SEC.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
  4. Gentile v. DIRECTOR OF THE DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SEC.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API