Legal Opinion

Orelia Hayes and Kimbler T. Sells v. The Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, United States of America

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 10, 1969No. 27176PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellants claim that Kimbler Sells was the “child” of Mr. and Mrs. John Hayes under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 416, and that they are therefore eligible for benefits under §§ 202(d), 202(e) and 202(g) of the Act upon the death of Mr. Hayes. The Secretary found that Kimbler was not the “child” of the Hayeses and denied benefits. The district court affirmed the ruling of the Secretary. We also affirm, finding no basis in fact or law for the appellants’ sole argument that Kimbler was “equitably adopted” by the Hayeses.

The facts of the case are not in dispute. Mr. and Mrs. Sells turned…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Price v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  2. Willie Mae Minefield, Widow of Lige Minefield v. Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mary L. Broussard v. Caspar W. Weinberger, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare,defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  2. Annie M. Smith, and Her Husband, William Smith v. Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  3. Herman Glaze, a Minor Who Sues by His Father and Next Friend, James Glaze v. Elliott L. Richardson, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  4. Lillian Williams v. Elliot L. Richardson, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  5. Smith v. RichardsonDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API