Legal Opinion

State v. Lowe

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 3, 2005PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCalkins, J.

[¶ 1] The State appeals, pursuant to 15 M.R.S.A. § 2115-A(2), (5) (2003) and M.R.App. P. 21(b), a judgment of acquittal entered in the Superior Court (Waldo County, Marden, J.) after a jury found Marshall Lowe guilty of failure to stop for an officer, 29-A M.R.S.A. § 2414(2) (1996) (Class E). The State contends that the Superior Court erroneously interpreted section 2414 to require proof that the signal given by the officer was one that a reasonable person would objectively recog*170nize as a signal for that person to stop. We agree that section 2414 does not require proof that the signal was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brent Leasing Co. v. State Tax AssessorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  2. State v. RaymondSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
  3. State v. HarringtonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  4. State v. StoddardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. GroverCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API